Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Más filtros










Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1321327, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38660359

RESUMEN

Introduction: The control of the COVID-19 epidemic has been focused on the development of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. All developed vaccines have reported safety and efficacy results in preventing infection and its consequences, although the quality of evidence varies depending on the vaccine considered. Different methodological designs have been used for their evaluation, which can influence our understanding of the effects of these interventions. CoronaVac is an inactivated vaccine, and it has been assessed in various studies, including clinical trials and observational studies. Given these differences, our objective was to explore the published information to answer the question: how has the efficacy/effectiveness and safety of CoronaVac been evaluated in different studies? This is to identify potential gaps and challenges to be addressed in understanding its effect. Methods: A scoping review was carried out following the methodology proposed by the Joanna Briggs Institute, which included studies carried out in humans as of 2020, corresponding to systematic reviews, clinical trials, analytical or descriptive observational studies, in which the effectiveness and/or safety of vaccines for COVID19 were evaluated or described. There were no age restrictions for the study participants. Results: The efficacy/effectiveness and safety of this vaccine was assessed through 113 studies. Nineteen corresponded to experimental studies, 7 of Phase II, 5 of Phase IV, and 4 were clinical trials with random assignment. Although some clinical trials with random assignment have been carried out, these have limitations in terms of feasibility, follow-up times, and with this, the possibility of evaluating safety outcomes that occur with low frequencies. Not all studies have used homogeneous methods of analysis. Both the prevention of infection, and the prevention of outcomes such as hospitalization or death, have been valued through similar outcomes, but some through multivariate analysis of dependencies, and others through analysis that try to infer causally through different control methods of confounding. Conclusion: Published information on the evaluation of the efficacy/effectiveness and safety of the CoronaVac is abundant. However, there are differences in terms of vaccine application schedules, population definition, outcomes evaluated, follow-up times, and safety assessment, as well as non-standardization in the reporting of results, which may hinder the generalizability of the findings. It is important to generate meetings and consensus strategies for the methods and reporting of this type of studies, which will allow to reduce the heterogeneity in their presentation and a better understanding of the effect of these vaccines.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Vacunación
2.
Cad Saude Publica ; 40(3): e00157723, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38536990

RESUMEN

This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of alterations in self-perceived mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic and their associated factors in four Latin American countries. This is a cross-sectional study based on data collected from adults in 2021 through the Collaborative Response COVID-19 Survey by the MacDonnell Academy at Washington University in St. Louis (United States). The sample was composed of 8,125 individuals from Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, and Chile. A generalized linear model for a binary outcome variable with a logistic link and fixed country effects was used. There were 2,336 (28.75%) individuals who considered having suffered alterations in self-perceived mental health. Unemployed individuals (OR = 1.40; 95%CI: 1.24-1.58), those with bad/regular quality of life (OR = 5.03; 95%CI: 4.01-6.31), and those with high socioeconomic status (OR = 1.66; 95%CI: 1.41-1.96) had a higher risk of self-perceived mental health alterations than those with full-time employment, excellent quality, and low socioeconomic status. According to the fixed-effects model, Brazilians living in the country during the pandemic, who disagreed with their government's decisions (OR = 2.05; 95%CI: 1.74-2.42) and lacked trust in their government (OR = 2.10; 95%CI: 1.74-2.42) had a higher risk of having self-perceived mental health alterations. Nearly 30% of respondents indicated that the COVID-19 pandemic altered their self-perceived mental health. This outcome was associated with political, sociodemographic, and health risk factors. These findings should help policymakers develop post-pandemic community interventions.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pueblos Sudamericanos , Adulto , Humanos , América Latina/epidemiología , Salud Mental , Calidad de Vida , Estudios Transversales , Pandemias , Brasil/epidemiología , Autoimagen
3.
Cad. Saúde Pública (Online) ; 40(3): e00157723, 2024. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1550194

RESUMEN

Abstract This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of alterations in self-perceived mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic and their associated factors in four Latin American countries. This is a cross-sectional study based on data collected from adults in 2021 through the Collaborative Response COVID-19 Survey by the MacDonnell Academy at Washington University in St. Louis (United States). The sample was composed of 8,125 individuals from Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, and Chile. A generalized linear model for a binary outcome variable with a logistic link and fixed country effects was used. There were 2,336 (28.75%) individuals who considered having suffered alterations in self-perceived mental health. Unemployed individuals (OR = 1.40; 95%CI: 1.24-1.58), those with bad/regular quality of life (OR = 5.03; 95%CI: 4.01-6.31), and those with high socioeconomic status (OR = 1.66; 95%CI: 1.41-1.96) had a higher risk of self-perceived mental health alterations than those with full-time employment, excellent quality, and low socioeconomic status. According to the fixed-effects model, Brazilians living in the country during the pandemic, who disagreed with their government's decisions (OR = 2.05; 95%CI: 1.74-2.42) and lacked trust in their government (OR = 2.10; 95%CI: 1.74-2.42) had a higher risk of having self-perceived mental health alterations. Nearly 30% of respondents indicated that the COVID-19 pandemic altered their self-perceived mental health. This outcome was associated with political, sociodemographic, and health risk factors. These findings should help policymakers develop post-pandemic community interventions.


Resumen Este estudio tuvo como objetivo estimar la prevalencia de alteraciones en la autopercepción de la salud mental durante la pandemia de COVID-19 y sus factores asociados en cuatro países de América Latina. Este es un estudio transversal de datos recopilados de adultos en el 2021 por medio de la investigación Respuesta Colaborativa a COVID-19 de la Academia McDonnell en la Universidad Washington en St. Louis (Estados Unidos). La muestra estuvo compuesta por 8.125 personas de Brasil, Colombia, México y Chile. El estudio utilizó un modelo lineal generalizado para una variable de desenlace binario con un enlace logístico y efectos fijos por país. En total, 2.336 (28,75%) personas consideraron que habían sufrido alteraciones en la autopercepción de la salud mental. Los desempleados (OR = 1,40; IC95%: 1,24-1,58), aquellos con calidad de vida mala/regular (OR = 5,03; IC95%: 4,01-6,31) y aquellos con alto nivel socioeconómico (OR = 1,66; IC95%: 1,41-1,96) presentaron mayor riesgo de alteraciones en la autopercepción de la salud mental que aquellos con empleo a tiempo completo, excelente calidad y bajo nivel socioeconómico. Según el modelo de efectos fijos, los brasileños que vivían en el país durante la pandemia y que no estuvieron de acuerdo con las decisiones del gobierno (OR = 2,05; IC95%: 1,74-2,42) y no confiaban en su gobierno (OR = 2,10; IC95%: 1,74-2,42) presentaron mayor riesgo de alteraciones en la autopercepción de la salud mental. Casi el 30% de los encuestados indicaron que la pandemia de COVID-19 alteró su autopercepción de la salud mental. Este desenlace se asoció con factores políticos, sociodemográficos y de riesgo a la salud. Estos hallazgos deben ayudar a los formuladores de políticas a desarrollar intervenciones comunitarias pospandémicas.


Resumo Este estudo teve como objetivo estimar a prevalência de alterações na autopercepção de saúde mental durante a pandemia de COVID-19 e seus fatores associados em quatro países da América Latina. Este é um estudo transversal de dados coletados de adultos em 2021 por meio da pesquisa Resposta Colaborativa à COVID-19 da Academia McDonnell na Universidade Washington em St. Louis (Estados Unidos). A amostra foi composta por 8.125 pessoas do Brasil, Colômbia, México e Chile. O estudo utilizou um modelo linear generalizado para uma variável de desfecho binário com uma conexão logística e efeitos fixos do país. No total, 2.336 (28,75%) pessoas consideraram ter sofrido alterações na autopercepção de saúde mental. Os desempregados (OR = 1,40; IC95%: 1,24-1,58), aqueles com qualidade de vida ruim/regular (OR = 5,03; IC95%: 4,01-6,31) e aqueles com alto nível socioeconômico (OR = 1,66; IC95%: 1,41-1,96) apresentaram maior risco de alterações na autopercepção de saúde mental do que aqueles com emprego em tempo integral, excelente qualidade e baixo nível socioeconômico. De acordo com o modelo de efeitos fixos, os brasileiros que viviam no país durante a pandemia, que discordavam das decisões do governo (OR = 2,05; IC95%: 1,74-2,42) e não confiavam em seu governo (OR = 2,10; IC95%: 1,74-2,42) apresentaram maior risco de alterações na autopercepção de saúde mental. Quase 30% dos entrevistados indicaram que a pandemia da COVID-19 alterou sua autopercepção de saúde mental. Esse desfecho estava associado a fatores políticos, sociodemográficos e de risco à saúde. Estes achados devem ajudar os formuladores de políticas a desenvolver intervenções comunitárias pós-pandemia.

4.
Gac Sanit ; 37: 102303, 2023.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37156068

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify the association between oral health and suspected cognitive impairment in older adults in Chile. METHOD: Cross-sectional study including 1826 people ≥60 years who participated in the National Health Survey of Chile, 2016-2017. Oral health was evaluated by the number of teeth, presence of caries, use of dental prostheses, self-reported oral health, and pain and/or discomfort in the oral cavity. Cognitive impairment was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The association was evaluated by logistic and linear regression, adjusted for sociodemographic and lifestyle variables. RESULTS: Compared with people without suspicion of cognitive impairment, people with suspected impairment had five fewer teeth (13.4 vs. 8.5 teeth), a much higher difference in women than in men, and a higher frequency of oral pain. Edentulism and fewer teeth were associated with a higher likelihood of suspected cognitive impairment, associations that were not maintained in adjusted models. Oral pain was associated with a higher likelihood of suspected impairment even in the most adjusted model (odds ratio: 1.99; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.09-3.63). In linear models, an increase of 2% (95%CI: 0.01-0.05) in the MMSE score was observed for each additional tooth. CONCLUSIONS: Poor oral health, particularly tooth loss and the presence of pain, was associated with cognitive impairment in older adults in Chile.


Asunto(s)
Disfunción Cognitiva , Salud Bucal , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Chile/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Disfunción Cognitiva/epidemiología , Dolor
5.
Rev Panam Salud Publica ; 47: e76, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37223328

RESUMEN

Objective: To describe the variation in COVID-19 mortality among residents of Cali, Colombia, in the second wave of the pandemic, before vaccines, and in the fourth wave, with vaccination roll-out in process, taking into account variables of sex, age group, comorbidities, and interval between onset of symptoms and death, and to estimate the number of deaths averted by vaccination. Methods: A cross-sectional study of second wave and fourth wave deaths and vaccination coverage. The frequencies of attributes of deceased population in the two waves were compared, including comorbidities. Machado's method was used to calculate an estimate of the number of deaths averted in the fourth wave. Results: There were 1 133 deaths in the second wave and 754 deaths in the fourth wave. It was calculated that approximately 3 763 deaths were averted in the fourth wave in Cali in the context of vaccination roll-out. Conclusions: The decline in COVID-19-associated mortality observed supports the continuation of the vaccination program. Given the lack of data to explain other possible reasons for this decline, such as on the severity of novel viral variants, the limitations of the study are discussed.

6.
Artículo en Inglés | PAHO-IRIS | ID: phr-57446

RESUMEN

[ABSTRACT]. Objective. To describe the variation in COVID-19 mortality among residents of Cali, Colombia, in the second wave of the pandemic, before vaccines, and in the fourth wave, with vaccination roll-out in process, taking into account variables of sex, age group, comorbidities, and interval between onset of symptoms and death, and to estimate the number of deaths averted by vaccination. Methods. A cross-sectional study of second wave and fourth wave deaths and vaccination coverage. The frequencies of attributes of deceased population in the two waves were compared, including comorbidities. Machado’s method was used to calculate an estimate of the number of deaths averted in the fourth wave. Results. There were 1 133 deaths in the second wave and 754 deaths in the fourth wave. It was calculated that approximately 3 763 deaths were averted in the fourth wave in Cali in the context of vaccination roll-out. Conclusions. The decline in COVID-19-associated mortality observed supports the continuation of the vac- cination program. Given the lack of data to explain other possible reasons for this decline, such as on the severity of novel viral variants, the limitations of the study are discussed.


[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. Describir la variación en la mortalidad por COVID-19 en los residentes de Cali, Colombia, en la segunda ola de la pandemia (antes de las vacunas) y en la cuarta ola (durante el despliegue de las vacunas). Se tomaron en cuenta las variables referidas al sexo, grupo de edad, comorbilidades e intervalo entre el inicio de los síntomas y la muerte y se estimó el número de muertes evitadas por la vacunación. Métodos. Estudio transversal sobre las muertes en la segunda y cuarta olas de la pandemia de COVID-19 y la cobertura de vacunación. Se compararon las frecuencias de los atributos correspondientes a la población fallecida durante las dos olas, incluidas las comorbilidades. Se utilizó el método de Machado para estimar el número de muertes evitadas en la cuarta ola. Resultados. Se registraron 1 133 muertes en la segunda ola y 754 en la cuarta. Se calculó que, en el contexto del despliegue de las vacunas, en la cuarta ola se evitaron aproximadamente 3 763 muertes en Cali. Conclusiones. La disminución observada en la mortalidad asociada a la COVID-19 respalda la continuación del programa de vacunación. Dada la falta de datos para explicar otras posibles causas de esta disminución, como puede ser la gravedad causada por las nuevas variantes virales, se analizan las limitaciones del estudio.


[RESUMO]. Objetivo. Descrever a variação da mortalidade por COVID-19 entre residentes de Cali, Colômbia, na segunda onda da pandemia (antes das vacinas) e na quarta onda (com a implantação da vacinação já em anda- mento), considerando as variáveis sexo, faixa etária, comorbidades e intervalo entre início dos sintomas e óbito, bem como estimar o número de óbitos evitados pela vacinação. Métodos. Estudo transversal de mortes e cobertura vacinal na segunda e quarta ondas da pandemia. Foram comparadas as frequências dos atributos da população que foi a óbito durante as duas ondas, incluindo comorbidades. Foi utilizado o método de Machado para estimar o número de mortes evitadas na quarta onda. Resultados. Houve 1.133 mortes na segunda onda e 754 mortes na quarta onda. Calcula-se que cerca de 3.763 mortes foram evitadas na quarta onda em Cali, no contexto da disponibilização das vacinas. Conclusões. A queda observada na mortalidade associada à COVID-19 apoia a continuidade do programa de vacinação. Considerando a falta de dados para explicar outros possíveis motivos para esta queda, como a gravidade das novas variantes do vírus, discutem-se as limitações do estudo.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Mortalidad , Colombia , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Mortalidad , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Mortalidad , Colombia
7.
Rev. panam. salud pública ; 47: e76, 2023. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1450273

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT Objective. To describe the variation in COVID-19 mortality among residents of Cali, Colombia, in the second wave of the pandemic, before vaccines, and in the fourth wave, with vaccination roll-out in process, taking into account variables of sex, age group, comorbidities, and interval between onset of symptoms and death, and to estimate the number of deaths averted by vaccination. Methods. A cross-sectional study of second wave and fourth wave deaths and vaccination coverage. The frequencies of attributes of deceased population in the two waves were compared, including comorbidities. Machado's method was used to calculate an estimate of the number of deaths averted in the fourth wave. Results. There were 1 133 deaths in the second wave and 754 deaths in the fourth wave. It was calculated that approximately 3 763 deaths were averted in the fourth wave in Cali in the context of vaccination roll-out. Conclusions. The decline in COVID-19-associated mortality observed supports the continuation of the vaccination program. Given the lack of data to explain other possible reasons for this decline, such as on the severity of novel viral variants, the limitations of the study are discussed.


RESUMEN Objetivo. Describir la variación en la mortalidad por COVID-19 en los residentes de Cali, Colombia, en la segunda ola de la pandemia (antes de las vacunas) y en la cuarta ola (durante el despliegue de las vacunas). Se tomaron en cuenta las variables referidas al sexo, grupo de edad, comorbilidades e intervalo entre el inicio de los síntomas y la muerte y se estimó el número de muertes evitadas por la vacunación. Métodos. Estudio transversal sobre las muertes en la segunda y cuarta olas de la pandemia de COVID-19 y la cobertura de vacunación. Se compararon las frecuencias de los atributos correspondientes a la población fallecida durante las dos olas, incluidas las comorbilidades. Se utilizó el método de Machado para estimar el número de muertes evitadas en la cuarta ola. Resultados. Se registraron 1 133 muertes en la segunda ola y 754 en la cuarta. Se calculó que, en el contexto del despliegue de las vacunas, en la cuarta ola se evitaron aproximadamente 3 763 muertes en Cali. Conclusiones. La disminución observada en la mortalidad asociada a la COVID-19 respalda la continuación del programa de vacunación. Dada la falta de datos para explicar otras posibles causas de esta disminución, como puede ser la gravedad causada por las nuevas variantes virales, se analizan las limitaciones del estudio.


RESUMO Objetivo. Descrever a variação da mortalidade por COVID-19 entre residentes de Cali, Colômbia, na segunda onda da pandemia (antes das vacinas) e na quarta onda (com a implantação da vacinação já em andamento), considerando as variáveis sexo, faixa etária, comorbidades e intervalo entre início dos sintomas e óbito, bem como estimar o número de óbitos evitados pela vacinação. Métodos. Estudo transversal de mortes e cobertura vacinal na segunda e quarta ondas da pandemia. Foram comparadas as frequências dos atributos da população que foi a óbito durante as duas ondas, incluindo comorbidades. Foi utilizado o método de Machado para estimar o número de mortes evitadas na quarta onda. Resultados. Houve 1.133 mortes na segunda onda e 754 mortes na quarta onda. Calcula-se que cerca de 3.763 mortes foram evitadas na quarta onda em Cali, no contexto da disponibilização das vacinas. Conclusões. A queda observada na mortalidade associada à COVID-19 apoia a continuidade do programa de vacinação. Considerando a falta de dados para explicar outros possíveis motivos para esta queda, como a gravidade das novas variantes do vírus, discutem-se as limitações do estudo.

8.
Gac. sanit. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 37: 102303, 2023. tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-220410

RESUMEN

Objetivo: Identificar la asociación entre salud oral y sospecha de deterioro cognitivo en personas mayores chilenas. Método: Estudio transversal con 1826 participantes ≥60 años de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud de Chile, 2016-2017. La salud oral fue evaluada por el número de dientes, la presencia de caries, el uso de prótesis dental y el autorreporte de salud oral y dolor en la cavidad oral. La sospecha de deterioro cognitivo fue evaluada mediante el Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Se empleó regresión logística y lineal, ajustada por variables sociodemográficas y de estilos de vida. Resultados: En comparación con personas sin sospecha de deterioro cognitivo, aquellas con sospecha de deterioro cognitivo presentaron cinco dientes menos (13,4 vs. 8,5 dientes), diferencia muy superior en mujeres que en hombres, y mayor frecuencia de dolor oral. El edentulismo y el menor número de dientes se asociaron a mayor probabilidad de sospecha de deterioro cognitivo, asociaciones que no se mantuvieron en modelos ajustados. El dolor oral se asoció a mayor probabilidad de sospecha de deterioro cognitivo (odds ratio: 1,99; intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC95%]: 1,09-3,63). Por cada diente adicional se observó un aumento del 2% (IC95%: 0,01-0,05) en la puntuación del MMSE. Conclusiones: La mala salud oral, en particular la pérdida de dientes y la presencia de dolor, se asociaron con deterioro cognitivo en personas mayores chilenas. (AU)


Objective: To identify the association between oral health and suspected cognitive impairment in older adults in Chile. Method: Cross-sectional study including 1826 people ≥60 years who participated in the National Health Survey of Chile, 2016-2017. Oral health was evaluated by the number of teeth, presence of caries, use of dental prostheses, self-reported oral health, and pain and/or discomfort in the oral cavity. Cognitive impairment was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The association was evaluated by logistic and linear regression, adjusted for sociodemographic and lifestyle variables. Results: Compared with people without suspicion of cognitive impairment, people with suspected impairment had five fewer teeth (13.4 vs. 8.5 teeth), a much higher difference in women than in men, and a higher frequency of oral pain. Edentulism and fewer teeth were associated with a higher likelihood of suspected cognitive impairment, associations that were not maintained in adjusted models. Oral pain was associated with a higher likelihood of suspected impairment even in the most adjusted model (odds ratio: 1.99; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.09-3.63). In linear models, an increase of 2% (95%CI: 0.01-0.05) in the MMSE score was observed for each additional tooth. Conclusions: Poor oral health, particularly tooth loss and the presence of pain, was associated with cognitive impairment in older adults in Chile. (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Disfunción Cognitiva/epidemiología , Salud Bucal , Disfunción Cognitiva , Estudios Transversales , Chile/epidemiología , Envejecimiento , Dolor
9.
Front Plant Sci ; 12: 787549, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35281698

RESUMEN

Paspalum dilatatum (common name dallisgrass), a productive C4 grass native to South America, is an important pasture grass found throughout the temperate warm regions of the world. It is characterized by its tolerance to frost and water stress and a higher forage quality than other C4 forage grasses. P. dilatatum includes tetraploid (2n = 40), sexual, and pentaploid (2n = 50) apomictic forms, but is predominantly cultivated in an apomictic monoculture, which implies a high risk that biotic and abiotic stresses could seriously affect the grass productivity. The obtention of reproducible and efficient protocols of regeneration and transformation are valuable tools to obtain genetic modified grasses with improved agronomics traits. In this review, we present the current regeneration and transformation methods of both apomictic and sexual cultivars of P. dilatatum, discuss their strengths and limitations, and focus on the perspectives of genetic modification for producing new generation of forages. The advances in this area of research lead us to consider Paspalum dilatatum as a model species for the molecular improvement of C4 perennial forage species.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...